“The judge’s direction was wrong in a number of respects… It was wrong to refer to an act which sober and reasonable people would inevitably realise must subject the victim to at least the risk of some harm, although not necessarily serious harm. That direction was repeated on a number of occasions. It has no place in the definition of murder.”
To read the case click here
–
| Links | Click | |
![]() |
CRIMINAL LAW RECORDED LECTURES, QUIZZES AND POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONS |
Criminal Law Online |
![]() |
REVISION SEMINARS FOR LLB AND GDL STUDENTS | QED LAW REVISION |
–

